Cases 1 - 10 of 10,273
Keritsis v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
Anderson v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv01951
Plaintiff:
Wilfred L. Anderson
Defendant:
Brenda Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daniels v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels and Remo H Daniels
Defendant:
Jerome G Bailey, Sgt Nelson, CO Pach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
232 W MASON LLC v. City of Jackson, a municipal corporation et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Donnelly v. Town of Scituate et al
as 1:2024cv11046
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Donnelly
Defendant:
Town of Scituate, Maura C. Curran, Andrew W Goodrich and others
Interested Party:
Town of Cohasset
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nwokoro v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02246
Petitioner:
Uwanbunkonye Nwokoro
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Property Officer Garret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dollar v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dollar
Defendant:
Derek Adams, Chasta Harrison and Van Buren County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
