Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant:
RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1959
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Respondent:
ANTHONY J. HARDY, ZACHARY SWAIN, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
In Re: Gladu
as 21-1639
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and JACOB ZERNICKI
Respondent:
ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY J. HARDY, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
