Cases 1 - 10 of 413
Seaverns et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Candace Seaverns, Seaverns Family Living Trust, Olen C. Priddy and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gallegos et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gallegos, Olen C. Priddy, Sheila Cavitt-Olguin and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and Does 1-20, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
United States of America v. Kemp
as 24-782
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REMBRANDT CARLOS KEMP
Nghiem v. Santa Clara University, et al.
as 24-521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER P. NGHIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY, NAM LING, GRACE LING and others
Cross et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2023cv01143
Plaintiff:
Wyley Cross, Tyler Kemp, Cori Peterson and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency and Administrator Angela Gladwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc et al v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2023cv10039
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
KEMP v. USA
as 1:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ARNELL KEMP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
USA v. Sherman Kemp
as 23-2725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERMAN KEMP, a/k/a Goose, a/k/a Hoseay Sachez, a/k/a Lil Dog
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. TINSTMAN et al
as 2:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHAN TINSTMAN, JOSEPH ESTEP, JEREMIAH L. KEMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
