Cases 1 - 10 of 256,674
Bates v. Lawrence et al
as 2:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Brad L Bates
Defendant:
J Lawrence, Cathay Eplett and Anna M Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alanafaay v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Ali Naser Hatef Alanafaay
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bragg v. McKinney
as 3:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
Tina M Bragg
Defendant:
Erik McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wang et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Qi Wang and Depeng Zhao
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
