Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Nampiaparampil v. The New York City Campaign Finance Board et al
as 1:2023cv06391
Plaintiff:
Devi Nampiaparampil
Defendant:
The New York City Campaign Finance Board, David Duhalde, Hannah Egerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nampiaparampil v. Loprest et al
as 1:2023cv03947
Plaintiff:
Devi Nampiaparampil
Defendant:
Amy Loprest, David Duhdale, Hannah Egerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gregory v. Harris et al
as 5:2021cv03311
Defendant:
Joel A Harris, John C Glaser, Jackson & Efting and others
Plaintiff:
Jeane Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory v. Harris et al
as 4:2020cv00084
Defendant:
The State Bar of California, M. Aaron Persky, John C. Glaser and others
Plaintiff:
Jeane Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC v. Persky
as 1:2020cv01975
Plaintiff:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Defendant:
Bruce Persky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Persky v. Paul
as 5:2020cv00025
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Christopher Persky
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gregory v. Small & Loeb GCA Law Partners LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00147
Defendant:
R. J. Pichon, Jackson & Efting, Santa Clara County Superior Court and others
Plaintiff:
Jeane Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michelle Gazave v. Aaron Persky, et al
as 19-16380
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK STEVENSON, CITY OF SAN JOSE, VIVIAN L. SANCHEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE GAZAVE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
