Cases 1 - 7 of 7
USA v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island , A. Ralph Mollis, Rhode Island Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Lusi v. Mollis et al
as 1:2010cv00350
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Lusi
Defendant:
A. Ralph Mollis, Robert Kando and Patrick C. Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Healey, Jr. et al v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Healey, Jr., Scott Avedesian , Timothy Burchett and others
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Donald Carcieri, A. Ralph Mollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Block et al v. Mollis et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Block, Moderate Party of Rhode Island and Moderate Party of RI PAC
Defendant:
A. Ralph Mollis, Robert Kando and Patrick Lynch
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bennett, et al v. Mollis, et al
as 09-1083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. BENNETT, MARGARET MARY MCCORMICK, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similary situated and DOMENIC D'AMBRA, JR.
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH MOLLIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of RI, JOHN A. DALUZ, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Rhode Island Board of Elections, FRANK J. REGO, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Rhode Island Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and RHODE ISLAND AFFILIATE
Bennett et al v. Mollis et al
as 1:2008cv00468
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Bennett, Domenic D'Ambra, Jr, Gregory L. Horton and others
Defendant:
Ralph Mollis, John A. Daluz, Frank J. Rego and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Warden Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jan Becker
Defendant:
Warden Hudson, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
