Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,478
Green v. USA
as 5:2024cv00102
Petitioner: Leneil Randolph Green
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant: Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff: Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant: Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant: DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph Johnson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6280
Petitioner: RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE
Randolph v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff: Dwayne Randolph
Defendant: Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Salvant et al
as 4:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: Byron J. Warren
Defendant: Judge Wayne Salvant, Phil Sorrells, Attorney Tim Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00230
Petitioner: Larry Randolph
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff: James Leslie Bailey
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Randolph County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
D.W. v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01870
Plaintiff: D.W.
Defendant: United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa and Susan Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?