Cases 1 - 10 of 5,946
Silva et al v. Arora et al
as 3:2024cv02350
Plaintiff:
Nathan Silva and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Silvas v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Julian Galvan Silvas, Jr
Defendant:
Lt. Warner, Sgt. Guiterez, Sgt. Syler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avalos Cruz v. Sky Maids, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01108
Defendant:
Eslaine L. Leonardo, Sky Maids, Inc., Lauro H. Leonardo and others
Plaintiff:
Mayra G. Avalos Cruz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Motley v. J. Manzanedo #17753 et al
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Courtney Motley
Defendant:
J. Manzanedo #17753, Carlos Silva #18356, Jeri Dermanetian Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prime/Park LaBrea Titleholder, LLC v. Starr Da Silva et al
as 2:2024cv02991
Plaintiff:
Prime/Park LaBrea Titleholder, LLC
Defendant:
Starr Da Silva and Tiffany Da Silva
Interested Party:
Franklin Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment
United States v. Miguel Silva-Torres, Jr.
as 24-1766
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miguel Silva-Torres, Jr.
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified:
Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Galicia Ramirez, et al. v. City of Tustin, et al.
as 24-2259
Plaintiff:
WENDY LORENA GALICIA RAMIREZ and KEVIN JOSUE GALICIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
CITY OF TUSTIN and ESTELLA SILVA
Robinson v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv02154
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Defendant:
Phillipe Silva, Quines, III, Sgt. Reynoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
