Cases 1 - 10 of 457
United States of America v. Slack
as 24-2404
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TOMMIE SLACK
Johnson et al v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Johnson and Danario Slack
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clark v. Dadisman et al.
as 5:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Clark
Defendant:
Detective Shaun Dadisman, Detective Gohlike, Officer Slack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. D. Barnes #823 et al
as 9:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Darius Richards, Benjamin Munson, Anthony Major and others
Defendant:
D. Barnes #823, Kim Salm Inmate Coordinator and Lieutenant Michael Slack #125
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slack v. Babcock Power Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01892
Plaintiff:
Regina Slack
Defendant:
Babcock Power Inc. and Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Duggins v. Pacheco et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
David Randall Duggins
Defendant:
Daniel V Pacheco, Thomas L Stevens and Traina L Slack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. D. Barnes #823 et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
David Richards
Defendant:
D. Barnes #823, Kim Salm Inmate Coordinator and Lieutenant Michael Slack #125
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyra v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jordan Tyra and Matthew J Tyra
Defendant:
Warden, James Slack and Timothy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Connecticut
as 23-8105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GORDON CLARK, -, in his individual capacity, in his capacities as husband, sole fiduciary, sole beneficiary, and sole creditor of the Estate of Lillian J. Clark
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Office of Governor NED LAMONT, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
