Cases 1 - 10 of 122
YOUNCE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Cleo Madison Younce
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Proffitt v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Proffitt
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Warden R. Younce, Sgt. Speas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Stith v. R. Younce
as 23-6902
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN L. STITH
Respondent / Appellee:
RODNEY W. YOUNCE, Warden
Tennessee State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Tennessee State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Tennessee, The Equity Alliance and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee, Tre Hargett, Mark Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Younce
as 2:2023cv00381
Petitioner:
Shun O. Patterson
Respondent:
R. Younce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Spradlin et al
as 5:2023cv06087
Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Molly Mae Ray, Rosalyn Lavern Jones, Forrest Younce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gregory Dodl v. R. Younce
as 23-6365
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY W. DODL
Respondent / Appellee:
RODNEY W. YOUNCE, Warden
Stith v. Younce
as 7:2023cv00140
Petitioner:
Benjamin L. Stith
Respondent:
R. Younce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dodl v. Younce
as 7:2023cv00032
Petitioner:
Gregory W. Dodl
Respondent:
R. Younce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
First Chicago Insurance Company v. Jones et al
as 5:2022cv06107
Plaintiff:
First Chicago Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rosalyn Lavern Jones, Molly Mae Ray, Michell Lynn Thaller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
