Cases 1 - 10 of 69
A.R. v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
A.R.
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriff's Department, County of Riverside, Sheriff Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
T.R. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
T.R. and A.R.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2023cv06597
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Merrick B. Garland, Gregory J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hitler v. People of the United States
as 3:2021cv04592
Defendant:
People of the United States
Plaintiff:
Carl A.R. Hitler and Carl Renowitzky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills, obo A.R. v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv04259
Defendant:
Ho Young Huh, Altria Enterprises, LLC, James Monsees and others
Plaintiff:
Heidi Mills, obo A.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hitler v. People of the United States
as 3:2020cv08017
Defendant:
People of the United States
Plaintiff:
Carl A.R. Hitler and Carl Renowitzky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hitler v. All Anti Christs
as 3:2020cv07699
Plaintiff:
Carl A.R. Hitler and Carl Renowitzky
Defendant:
All Anti Christs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv07061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hitler v. Palini et al
as 3:2020cv06824
Defendant:
Sasoon Palini, Evil Doers and Anti-Christ
Plaintiff:
Carl A.R. Hitler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
