Cases 1 - 5 of 5
North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Pension Fund et al v. A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01764
Plaintiff:
North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Pension Fund , North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Health Fund , North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc. and Steven Lockhart
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois et al v. A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc.
as 1:2013cv07642
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds of Illinois and Angelica B Ambrose
Defendant:
A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois et al v. A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc.
as 3:2013cv50317
Plaintiff:
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Pension Fund et al v. Labor Management Cooperation Trust Fund et al
as 3:2013cv00542
Plaintiff:
North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Pension Fund , North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Health Fund , North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc. and Steven Lockhart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03592
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , Chicago and Northeast Illinois Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice and Training Program and others
Defendant:
A2Z Flooring by Lockhart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
