Cases 1 - 10 of 18,596
Abbott v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2025sf66070
Plaintiff:
James Abbott
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roth v. Abbott Laboratories
as 1:2025cv06600
Plaintiff:
Michael Roth
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv06578
Plaintiff:
Dontrel Robinson
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson & Company, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abbott v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2025sf66048
Plaintiff:
David Abbott
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Purohit v. Abbott Laboratories Inc.
as 2:2025cv01026
Plaintiff:
Ravindranath V. Purohit
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Corpron v. Abbott
as 1:2025cv00643
Plaintiff:
Leo Solan-Baine Corpron
Defendant:
Dan Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrin Abbott v. James Corrigan
as 25-1532
Petitioner:
DERRIN TOREY ABBOTT
Respondent:
JAMES CORRIGAN
Young v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2025cv00209
Plaintiff:
Steven Damien Young
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Machen v. Albright et al
as 6:2025cv00243
Plaintiff:
Christopher Machen
Defendant:
Alan D Albright, Captain Sanders, Gregory Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Abbott
as 25-40335
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reginald Peoples, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Governor of the State of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
