Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Liu v. Rajacic et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Michelle Rajacic, 142 east 33rd street realty Corp., Michele Chaplin and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
JOHN 1-10 DOES, jane #1-10 does and Company ABC #1-10
Plaintiff:
daming liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 co Diversity-Conversion
COOK v. WALMART INC et al
as 3:2021cv16188
Plaintiff:
MARINA COOK
Defendant:
WALMART INC, ABC 1-10 PROPERTY OWNERS, DEF 1-10 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. DEF INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv18930
Defendant:
621 EVENTS LLC, HUDSON TERRACE, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEITH et al v. AMPAH et al
as 2:2019cv12499
Defendant:
PHILLIP W HOOFNAGLE, STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, MARVIN P AMPAH and others
Plaintiff:
DALE KEITH, TAJANAE KEITH and DEBRA ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SILVER v. KONE INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03648
Plaintiff:
RENE SILVER
Defendant:
KONE INC. , VERTICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS INC., ABC 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALBERTI et al v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06453
Plaintiff:
FABIO ALBERTI and LORNA ALBERTI
Defendant:
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. , ABC 1-10 and THE HOME DEPOT INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SETTON v. CONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF WEST DEAL, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv02328
Plaintiff:
SARI J. SETTON
Defendant:
CONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF WEST DEAL, INC., ABC-1- 10 and XYZ CORP. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ-MORALES v. HOBART CORPORATION et al
as 3:2011cv01612
Plaintiff:
VICTORICO PEREZ-MORALES
Defendant:
HOBART CORPORATION , ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INCORPORATED , FICTITIOUS CORPORATIONS ABC 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
