Cases 21 - 30 of 42
PHILLIPS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79955
Plaintiff:
OMER D PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENRY v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79946
Plaintiff:
TRIXIE A HENRY
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79951
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79944
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILLIARD v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79947
Plaintiff:
LEE HILLIARD
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79949
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79948
Plaintiff:
ALLENE JONES
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKERSON V ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79943
Plaintiff:
RHODNEY W DICKERSON and CAROLYN DICKERSON
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79950
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE LOS SANTOS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79942
Plaintiff:
ISABEL DE LOS SANTOS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
