Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Windham v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Windham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wethersfield v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv01041
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Wethersfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Middletown v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00919
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Middletown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Enfield v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00789
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Enfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norwich v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00770
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Norwich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Streiter v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv01425
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Nadja Streiter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Roundtree v. Forest Laboratories, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Gail Roundtree
Defendant:
Forest Laboratories, LLC , Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc and Actavis Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boemmels v. Actavis Group HF et al
as 3:2010cv00513
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Boemmels
Defendant:
Actavis Group HF, Actavis Inc , Mylan Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goldberg et al v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al
as 3:2009cv01069
Plaintiff:
Marvin Goldberg and Marvin Goldberg
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Inc, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
