Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5085
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Carilion Medical Center, 15cv192, Tarpon Springs Hospital Foundation, Inc., 15cv192, Southwest Volusia Healthcare Corporation, 15cv192 and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2017cv01041
Plaintiff: ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST GLENOAKS HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM GEORGIA, INC. and others
Defendant: THOMAS EDMUNDS PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv00455
Defendant: THOMAS E. PRICE
Plaintiff: ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST GLENOAKS HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Abington Memorial Hospital, et al v. Sylvia Burwell
as 16-5380
Plaintiff - Appellant: Abington Memorial Hospital, Adventist Glenoaks Hospital, Adventist Hinsdale Hospital and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sylvia Mathews Burwell, in her capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00940
Plaintiff: ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST GLENOAKS HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM GEORGIA, INC. and others
Defendant: SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Burns v. Adventist Midwest Health et al
as 1:2015cv07776
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Burns
Defendant: Adventist Midwest Health an Illinois Corporation doing business as Adventist Hinsdale Hospital, Carissa T Donato and Tyran E Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PORTERCARE ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2015cv00192
Plaintiff: PORTERCARE ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM , ADVENTIST BOLINGBROOK HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST GLENOAKS HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01765
Plaintiff: ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST GLENOAKS HOSPITAL , ADVENTIST HINSDALE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?