Cases 1 - 10 of 489
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Swift & Staley Inc.
as 5:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Swift & Staley Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al v. Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
as 2:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC and United Steelworkers Local 244M
Defendant:
Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Michael Walden v. General Electric International, Inc., et al
as 24-5141
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. WALDEN
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., aka General Electric, aka General Electric Aviation and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, CLC
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (Newport News Shipbuilding Division)
as 4:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Respondent:
Ingalls Inc., Newport News Shipbuilding Division and Huntingtion Ingalls Inc., Newport News Shipbuilding Division
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Ameron Pole Products LLC
as 2:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Ameron Pole Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. Rubottom et al
as 9:2024cv80073
Plaintiff:
Communication Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC, Dylan R. Owens and Mark A. Warme
Defendant:
Chair of the Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, Palm Beach County, Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Johns Manville Corporation
as 3:2023cv02346
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Johns Manville Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
United Steel v. Tecnocap, LLC
as 23-2273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL & SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION AFL-CIO/CLC and LOCAL 152M
Defendant / Appellee:
TECNOCAP, LLC
SeAH Steel VINA Corporation v. United States
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
SeAH Steel VINA Corporation
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
Bull Moose Tube Company, Maruichi American Corporation, The United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
SeAH Steel VINA Corporation v. United States
as 1:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
SeAH Steel VINA Corporation
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
Bull Moose Tube Company, Maruichi American Corporation, The United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
