Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CamCara, Inc. v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
as 5:2021cv02264
Plaintiff:
CamCara, Inc. individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as AST Waterjet
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WENDLING v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC LTD PLAN et al
as 5:2020cv05738
Plaintiff:
CAROL WENDLING
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC LTD PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 5:2020cv03223
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
A HASHIM et al v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
as 5:2020cv01213
Plaintiff:
JEHAN HASHIM A HASHIM, AHMED HASHIM A HASHIM, SARA HASHIM A HASHIM and others
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
as 5:2018cv04878
Plaintiff:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.
Defendant:
THE PROCTER AND GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv03142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv07405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
