Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kocsor v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv24356
Plaintiff:
Zsolt Kocsor
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Customs and Border Protection Officer Frank Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rong Li v. Akal Security, Inc.
as 17-55168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONG DONG LI
Defendant - Appellee:
AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Rong Li v. Akal Security, Inc.
as 14-55956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONG DONG LI
Defendant - Appellee:
AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Hilliard v. Akal Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01241
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Hilliard
Defendant:
Akal Security, Inc., Northern Management Services, Inc., U.S. General Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norwood Price v. Michael Peerson, et al
as 14-55836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORWOOD PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL PEERSON, AKAL SECURITY INC., WILLIAM WALLACE and others
Owenah v. United States of America, The et al
as 1:2013cv09319
Plaintiff:
Majed Owenah
Defendant:
United States of America, The , AKAL Security Inc, Gerald Hibbler and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Sentry Claims Service for use and benefit of Alpha Baking Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Norwood Price v. Michael Peerson et al
as 2:2013cv03390
Defendant:
Akal Security Inc, John Does, Michael Peerson and others
Plaintiff:
Norwood Price
Pedro Rodriguez v. AKAL Security, Inc.
as 13-10714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO PRECIADO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Preciado Rodriguez v. Akal Security, Inc.
as 1:2012cv20550
Plaintiff:
Pedro Preciado Rodriguez
Defendant:
AKAL Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 0134
Li v. Akal Security, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02465
Plaintiff:
Rong Dong Li
Defendant:
Akal Security, Inc. , John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
