Cases 1 - 10 of 25
United States of America v. Kaufman
as 23-6807
Defendant:
TONY GEORGITON and Sealed Defendant 2
Defendant / Appellant:
ALAN KAUFMAN and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
National Credit Union Administration Board, as Liquidating Agent for Melrose Credit Union v. Kaufman et al
as 1:2023cv01061
Plaintiff:
National Credit Union Administration Board, as Liquidating Agent for Melrose Credit Union
Defendant:
Alan Kaufman and Mitchell Reiver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
CUMIS Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. v. Kaufman
as 22-2930
Plaintiff:
CUMIS Specialty Insurance Company, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Alan Kaufman
CUMIS Specialty Insurance Company, Inc. v. Kaufman
as 1:2021cv11107
Plaintiff:
CUMIS Specialty Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Alan Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
United States of America v. Kaufman
as 21-2589
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tony Georgiton, AKA Sealed Defendant 2
Defendant / Appellant:
Alan Kaufman, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
Kaufman LLC v. Feinberg
as 20-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kaufman LLC and Alan Kaufman
Defendant / Appellee:
Norman Arnoff, Richard Lawrence Derzaw and Herbert Feinberg
Defendant:
Richaredacted Derzaw, Steven G. Storch and Jason Levin
Yachts, LLC et al v. City of Miami
as 1:2020cv21819
Defendant:
City of Miami
Plaintiff:
Alan Kaufman and Yachts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Middleton v. The Pickle Guys, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09830
Defendant:
Michael Chu, MIKE CHU, Alan Kaufman and others
Plaintiff:
RHESHAD MIDDLETON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kaufman LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00958
Kaufman LLC et al v. Feinberg et al
as 3:2017cv00958
Plaintiff:
Kaufman LLC and Alan Kaufman
Defendant:
Herbert Feinberg, Norman Arnoff and Richard Derzaw
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
