Cases 1 - 10 of 4,692
Alexander v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Kristine Alexander
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. McCollough
as 24-2366
Defendant:
ROBERT ALEXANDER MCCOLLOUGH and Robert McCollough
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Patterson v. Matsui et al
as 4:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
FNU Matsui, FNU Alexander and San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Sandoval-Cho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2252
Petitioner:
MYLVIA SACELA SANDOVAL-CHO and DIEGO ALEXANDER MELCHOR-SANDOVAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Vonda et al
as 2:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Alexander Vonda individually and: doing business as Red Bottomz and Dreamscape Partners LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Red Bottomz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Alexander v. Springer et al
as 3:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Carrie Alexander
Defendant:
Daniel D. Springer, Enrique Salem, Peter Solvik and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
