Cases 1 - 10 of 17
TUCKER MEUSE v. ELLIOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
AMANDA D. TUCKER MEUSE
Defendant:
RAMONA ELLIOTT, OFFICE OF UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, TIFFANY L. CARROLL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Tucker-Meuse v. Field et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker-Meuse
Defendant:
Dane Field, Curtis Ching, Tifanny Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Divison of Banking of Illinois et al v. Bank of Lincolnwood and Assigns
as 1:2021cv00437
Plaintiff:
Divison of Banking of Illinois, Federal Deposit Insurance Commission and Amanda D. Tucker-Meuse
Defendant:
Bank of Lincolnwood and Assigns, Dane Field, Curtis Ching and others
Interested Party:
Amanda D. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1461
TUCKER MEUSE v. WHYTE et al
as 1:2021cv02871
Plaintiff:
AMANDA D. TUCKER MEUSE
Defendant:
CLIFFORD WHYTE and OFFICE OF THE USTP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Tucker Meuse v. Epps-McElroy et al
as 1:2019cv00837
Defendant:
C (I) Lamont Smith, Donald (I) Lefkowits, C Lamont Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker Meuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Early et al
as 1:2019cv00835
Defendant:
Joyce Davidson, Doris Gundersen, Doris (I) Gunderson and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Tucker Meuse and Amanda D Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
