Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In re: Waterman v. , et al
as 21-3049
Respondent:
DAVID M. GROVES, AMANDA KAYE PHILLIPS, JUDAH ELLIS and others
Petitioner:
BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. City of Austin, TX et al
as 1:2021cv00173
Defendant:
City of Austin, TX, Julie Tower, Ascension and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2020cv00617
Defendant:
Ascension, Detective Calvin Pierce, Christopher Born and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Austin Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Christopher Born, Travis County, TX, Robert Fischer and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Austin Police Department, et al
as 20-5025
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, JOHN DOE, sued as Male Paramedic, Male US Marshal 1, Male US Marshal 2, Male US Marshal 3 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMANDA KAYE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Phillips v. Austin Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Christopher Born, Carmen Nickel, Brittany Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Amanda Phillips v. Austin Diagnostic Clinic Surg
as 18-50184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMANDA KAYE PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
AUSTIN DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC SURGERY CENTER
Phillips v. Austin Diagnostic Clinic Surgery Center
as 1:2017cv00940
Defendant:
Austin Diagnostic Clinic Surgery Center
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Facebook, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00884
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kaye Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
