Cases 1 - 10 of 36
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
BRUCE THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ACCOUNTING SERVICE CENTER, AMAZON.COM INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
SABRINA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, JUDGE THERESA A. BISENIUS, JUDGE JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK and others
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff:
ADAM STREGE
Defendant:
GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others
Lewis v. Bezos et al
as 1:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Lewis
Defendant:
Jeff Bezos, Amazon Headquarters and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mallouk et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Mallouk, Alfredo Rodriguez Perez and Arjun Dhawan
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Naomi Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego, et al
as 23-55475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAOMI BAR-LEV
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, JONATHAN DUNGAN, JASON LANGLEY and others
Rodriguez Perez v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Rodriguez Perez
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
David Webb v. James Hall, et al
as 22-3267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY JAMES P. HALL, Co-owner, KIMBERLY A. PARKS, Legal Assistant, MARY F. FITZPATRICK, Legal Assistant and others
Alexandre et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Luciano Alexandre, Christine Louise Johnson, Eric Nelson and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bolduc v. Amazon.com Inc.
as 4:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Crystal Bolduc
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
