Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. State of Texas
as 21-1445
Interested Party:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, WASC SENIOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COMMISSION, ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES and others
Defendant:
NATHANIEL R. MENDELL, US Attorney and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, JILL DOE, ANNE DOE and others
Not Yet Classified:
NEW YORK STATE COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Found. for Indiv. Rgts in Edu., et al
as 20-1748
Interested Party:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, WASC SENIOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COMMISSION, ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, JILL DOE, ANNE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BETSY DEVOS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education, KENNETH L. MARCUS, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Right, US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Victim Rights Law Center et al v. DeVos et al
as 1:2020cv11104
Defendant:
Elizabeth D. DeVos, U.S. Department of Education, Kenneth L. Marcus and others
Plaintiff:
Legal Voice, Victim Rights Law Center, Equal Rights Advocates and others
Amicus Curiae:
National LGBTQ Task Force, Vera House, Inc., California Women's Law Center and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Independent Women's Law Center, Speech First, Inc., Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
