Cases 1 - 5 of 5
American Educational Research, et al v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
as 17-7039
Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Educational Research Association, Inc., American Psychological Association, Inc. and National Council on Measurement In Education, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
Intervenor - Appellee:
American Society for Testing and Materials, National Fire Protection Association, Inc. and American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-conditioning Engineers, Inc.
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
as 1:2014cv00857
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC. and AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC.
Intervenor:
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS, NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, INC. and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, INC.
Defendant:
PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SINA BAHRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GROSSMAN v. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv02034
Plaintiff:
IRA GROSSMAN
Defendant:
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. and AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION PRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENGUM v. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01898
Plaintiff:
ERIC S. ENGUM
Defendant:
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. and AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION PRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In re APA ASSESSMENT FEE LITIGATION
as 1:2010cv01780
Plaintiff:
ELLEN G. LEVINE
Defendant:
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. and AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION PRACTICE ORGANIZATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.