Cases
Charles Corley, et al v. Fairbanks Morse Pump Corp, et al
as 14-13659
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant - Appellee: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., individually and as successors in interest to Allied Chemical, Inc. f.k.a. Bendix Corporation, f.k.a. Bendix Corporation, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIS, LLC, FAIRBANKS MORSE PUMP CORPORATION and others
: BILL VANN COMPANY, INC., MCCONNELL SALES AND ENGINEERING CORP., REFRACTORY SALES & SERVICE CO., INC. and others
Charles Corley, et al v. Fairbanks Morse Pump Corp, et al
as 14-13659
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant / Appellee: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., individually and as successors in interest to Allied Chemical, Inc. f.k.a. Bendix Corporation, f.k.a. Bendix Corporation, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIS, LLC, FAIRBANKS MORSE PUMP CORPORATION and others
Not Classified By Court: MCCONNELL SALES AND ENGINEERING CORP., REFRACTORY SALES & SERVICE CO., INC., LONG-LEWIS, INC. and others
D'Amato SpA v. Pactrans Air & Sea USA et al
as 1:2014cv00046
Defendant: Pactrans Air & Sea USA and Pactrans Air
Garnishee: Schweizer Aircraft Corp., Caterpillar Inc., American Standard Trane Ltd and others
Plaintiff: Fratelli D'Amato SpA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
CORLEY et al v. LONG-LEWIS, INC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv61113
Plaintiff: CHARLES CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant: LONG-LEWIS, INC, BIRMINGHAM RUBBER AND GASKET CO., INC., BILL VANN COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Corley et al v. Long-Lewis, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01812
Plaintiff: Charles Corley and Myra Corley
Defendant: Long-Lewis, Inc., Long-Lewis, Inc., Birmingham Rubber and Gasket Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?