Cases 1 - 10 of 21
GILL v. VIOREL et al
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
STEVEN VIOREL, AUSTIN GILL, BLOCK BY BLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILL v. NBC NEWS et al
as 1:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
NBC NEWS, JENNIFER BUSH, STEVEN VIOREL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GILL v. STERNLIB et al
as 1:2022cv02981
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
JOSEPH STERNLIB, CATHY LANIER and LINDA SINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cheung et al v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
Emily Cheung and Andrew Gill
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suggs v. Adams, et al.,
as 1:2012cv02842
Plaintiff:
Richard Suggs
Defendant:
Jonathan Adams, Kenneth McKim, Erick Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILL v. DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2011cv00767
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DC PUBLIC LIBRARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. WASHINGTON DC PUBLIC LIBRARY et al
as 1:2011cv00740
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DC PUBLIC LIBRARY, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY et al
as 1:2011cv00735
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
