Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WYSOCKI et al v. WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL et al
as 2:2021cv14132
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL WYSOCKI, ISABELLA WYSOCKI and JAMES WYSOCKI
Defendant:
WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL, ANDREW WEBSTER, CHRISTINE CERMINARO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL et al
as 1:2021cv14131
Defendant:
WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL, CHRISTINE CERMINARO, ROBERT M BOWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOYSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15409
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WEBSTER BOYSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEBSTER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06803
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WEBSTER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00612
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harry Lott v. Marietta Municipal Court, et al
as 14-3063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY WILLIAM LOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIETTA MUNICIPAL COURT, THE APPEALS 4TH APPELLATE DISTRICT 205, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Webster et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A Webster and Andrew Webster
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cheryl A. Webster et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-09333
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A Webster and Andrew Webster
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Cheryl A. Webster et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2013cv09333
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Webster and Cheryl A Webster
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
