Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Medina, et al. v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Alba Angel Medina and Jose Vinicio Santiago Cifuentes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
USA v. Miguel Medina
as 22-30206
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL MEDINA
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03185
Petitioner:
Angel Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1238
Petitioner:
MARIA DE LOS ANGELES MEDINA RODALES and XOCHITL GUADALUPE CERVANTES MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In Re: Medina
as 22-217
Petitioner:
Ramon Medina, AKA Andres Medina, AKA Antonio Medina, AKA Andre Kike Medina, AKA Andrea Medina, AKA Kike Medina, AKA Medina Andre, AKA Angel Medina, AKA Agosto Andres, AKA Cristino Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Lopez v. Medina Multi Services LLC et al
as 3:2021cv50425
Plaintiff:
Josue Isaac Alfaro Lopez
Defendant:
Medina Multi Services LLC, Karla Barraza and Angel Medina
MEDINA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57718
Plaintiff:
ANGEL MEDINA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEDINA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42467
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL MEDINA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emin Saakyan v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2021cv06605
Plaintiff:
Emin Saakyan
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Miguel Angel Medina-Cervantes and Does 1 through 20, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MEDINA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10013
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
