Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ruiz-Rivera et al v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 3:2021cv01152
Plaintiff: Instituto de Educacion Universal, Angel Ruiz-Rivera and IEU
Defendant: Hon. Ojatta Rogeriee Thompson, U.S. Attorney General, Esq. Humberto Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al v. Ruiz-Rivera
as 17-1743
Debtor - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina
Trustee - Appellee: MONSITA LECAROZ-ARRIBAS
Movant - Appellant: ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA
Interested Party: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD, US TRUSTEE, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS and others
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Ruiz-Rivera
as 17-1337
Plaintiff / Appellee: LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, ALEJANDRO J. GARCIA PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ and others
Defendant: AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, DECAGON HOLDINGS 1, LLC, PUERTO RICO AAA PORTFOLIO BOND FUND II, INC. and others
Petitioner / Appellant: ANGEL RUIZ RIVERA
Interested Party: FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Ruiz-Rivera
as 17-1337
Plaintiff - Appellee: LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Defendant: AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD, ALEJANDRO GARCIA PADILLA and others
Movant - Appellant: ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA
Interested Party: FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Ambac Assurance Corporation
as 17-1272
Plaintiff - Appellee: LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant: AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD, ALEJANDRO GARCIA PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ and others
Movant: JOSE F. RODRIGUEZ, DECAGON HOLDINGS 4, LLC, DECAGON HOLDINGS 10, LLC and others
Interested Party: GOLDEN TREE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP, MERCED CAPITAL, LP, OLD BELLOWS PARTNERS LLP and others
Intervenor: FIRST PUERTO RICO TAX-EXEMPT FUND, INC.
Lex Claims, LLC, et al v. Alejandro Garcia Padilla, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1241
Plaintiff - Appellee: LEX CLAIMS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS, LLC, JACANA HOLDINGS II, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD
Defendant: ALEJANDRO GARCIA PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, LUIS G. CRUZ-BATISTA and others
Intervenor: GOLDEN TREE ASSET MANAGEMENT LP, MERCED CAPITAL, LP, OLD BELLOWS PARTNERS LLP and others
Interested Party: JOSE F. RODRIGUEZ, DECAGON HOLDINGS 4, LLC, DECAGON HOLDINGS 3, LLC and others
Movant: FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Assured Guaranty Corporation, et al v. Garcia-Padilla, et al
as 17-1044
Plaintiff - Appellee: ASSURED GUARANTY CORPORATION, ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: ALEJANDRO J. GARCIA-PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, INGRID RIVERA-ROCAFORT and others
Interested Party - Appellant: ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA
Ruiz-Rivera et al v. The New York Times, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02800
Plaintiff: Angel Ruiz-Rivera, Instituto de Educacion Universal, Agueybana Ruiz-Paneque and others
Defendant: The New York Times, Inc., Arthur G. Sulzberger, Jr., CBS Television Network and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Assured Guaranty Corp., et al v. Garcia-Padilla, et al
as 16-2208
Plaintiff - Appellee: ASSURED GUARANTY CORPORATION, ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: ALEJANDRO GARCIA-PADILLA, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, INGRID RIVERA-ROCAFORT and others
Interested Party - Appellant: ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA
Ruiz-Rivera v. Dow Lohnes and Albertson, et al
as 12-1520
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANGEL RUIZ-RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee: BENNY F. CEREZO, DOW LOHNES, PLLC, a/k/a Dow Lohnes and Albertson, RAUL SANTIAGO-MELENDEZ and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?