Cases 1 - 10 of 22
RICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20152
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RICE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv02538
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY RICE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawk et al v. L'Oral USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07044
Plaintiff:
Annette Hawk and Anthony Rice
Defendant:
L'Oral USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Revlon Consumer Prodcuts Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77738
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00995
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORDINGLY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03134
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COX, CLIFFORD RILEY, PETER CAROTHERS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cordingly et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02103
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cox, Clifford Riley, Peter Carothers and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
USA v. Anthony Rice
as 17-3007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony Rice, also known as Twin
Paul Rice v. John Pate
as 15-6485
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY RICE, a/k/a Paul Rice
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN PATE
United States of America v. Rice, Jr.
as 4:2014cv12479
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Rice, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
