Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 319
USA v. Martinez-Padilla
as 24-40260
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Juan Antonio Martinez-Padilla
Contreras v. Baysore et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff: Jose Antonio Martinez Contreras
Defendant: Warden D. Baysore and FCI Yazoo City Medium
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez v. Bruce P., et al.
as 24-1810
Plaintiff: ANTONIO MARTINEZ, JR.
Defendant: BRUCE P., Owner - Porterville Citrus, TONY L., Owner - Porterville Citrus, MARIO, Supervisor - Porterville Citrus and others
Martinez Ocasio v. Madronal Garrone
as 3:2024cv01442
Plaintiff: Benito Antonio Martinez Ocasio
Defendant: Eric Guillermo Madronal Garrone
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
USA v. Martinez
as 24-50130
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Marco Antonio Martinez
Martinez v. Rojas, et al.
as 24-899
Plaintiff: ANTONIO MARTINEZ
Defendant: F. ROJAS, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, OFFICER DOE #3 and others
Stensrud Incorporated et al v. Unknown Parties We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Benito Antonio Martinez Ocasio, Stensrud Incorporated and Bad Bunny
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Elman Martinez-Arguera v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1149
Petitioner: ELMAN ANTONIO MARTINEZ-ARGUERA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant: RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant: MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BLOUNT v. MCKINNES et al
as 5:2023cv00324
Plaintiff: Anthony Blount
Defendant: Greenbush Logistics, Inc., Antonio M McKinnes, ANTONIO MARTINEZ MCKINNES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?