Intellectual Property Cases filed in Indiana
APOTEX INC. et al v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY
as 1:2022cv02342
Plaintiff: APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP.
Defendant: ELI LILLY & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. APOTEX, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01037
Defendant: APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX, INC.
Plaintiff: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. APOTEX INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01512
Plaintiff: ACRUX DDS PTY LTD., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ELI LILLY EXPORT S.A.
Defendant: APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. APOTEX CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv00586
Defendant: APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX INC.
Plaintiff: DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
NYCOMED GMBH et al v. APOTEX INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01073
Defendant: APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX INC.
Plaintiff: NYCOMED GMBH, SUNOVION PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. APOTEX INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00499
Defendant: APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX INC.
Plaintiff: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY et al v. APOTEX INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00281
Plaintiff: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC.
Defendant: APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. et al v. APOTEX INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00102
Plaintiff: ALCON RESEARCH, LTD., ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. and others
Defendant: APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?