Cases 1 - 10 of 14,213
Hunter Jr. v. Mealey-Hunter et al
as 4:2025cv02523
Defendant:
Domco Products Texas, Inc., Individually as as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as Domco Inc., Floor Products (Texas), Azrock Industries Inc., Uvalde Rock Asphalt Company, Redco Corporation, formerly known as Crane Co., Claire Mealey-Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Hunter Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Monroe et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp., as successor-by-merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv00218
Plaintiff:
Philip Monroe and Frances Monroe
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corp., as successor-by-merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., American Biltrite, Inc., Baltimore Aircoil Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Danos v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2024cv02813
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Graybar Electric Company, Inc., HB Fuller Co and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J Danos
Cross-Defendant:
WM. Powell Company, Foster Wheeler, LLC, Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross-Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and Avondale Industries, Inc.
Cross-Complainant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. and Avondale Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Monlux v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Defendant:
Valves and Controls US Inc formerly known as Weir Valves & Controls USA Inc doing business as Atwood & Morrill Co Inc, WestRock Company, Cleaver-Brooks Inc formerly known as Aqua-Chem Inc doing business as Cleaver-Brooks Division and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine M Monlux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dean, Sr. et al v. AII Acquisition LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01467
Defendant:
AII Acquisition LLC, Flowserve Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA and others
Plaintiff:
Nile Dean, Sr. and Camellia Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gerads v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2023cv03672
Plaintiff:
James Gerads
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Bader v. Abex Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00152
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, CNH Industrial America, LLC, Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney G. Bader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Christensen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv05255
Defendant:
3M Company, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crane Environmental, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Emmett Christensen, Linda G. Christensen and Linda G Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Rodriguez v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
keith rodriguez
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross Defendant:
Trinity Industries, Inc., Redco, Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association, Marsh Buggies, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Pennsylvania Insurance Company, Pennsylvania General Insurance Company, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Farris v. Avon Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02023
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Brenntag Specialties LLC, DCO LLC, ITT, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Burnham LLC, Empire Comfort Systems, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, GG of Florida, Inc., Goulds Pumps (N.Y.) Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Goulds Pumps LLC, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA), LLC, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Lennox International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
