Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Qualcomm Incorporated et al v. ARM Holdings PLC
as 1:2024cv00490
Defendant:
ARM Holdings PLC and ARM LTD.
Plaintiff:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kutt v. Apple Inc.
as 20-1757
Defendant / Appellee:
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., NVIDIA CORPORATION, NOKIA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MERS KUTT
Michael Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation, et al
as 20-15326
Defendant / Appellee:
INTEL CORPORATION, in concerted action with ARM Holdings plc & ARM Inc. executives and their corporate attorneys, ARM, INC. and ARM HOLDINGS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE
Kutt v. Apple Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00316
Defendant:
Google Corporation, Storage Post Inc, Seasons Condominiums and others
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bruzzone v. Arm Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02943
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bruzzone
Defendant:
Arm Inc. and Arm Holdings, PLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kutt v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Samsung Electronics Company Ltd., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kutt v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Samsung Electronics Company Ltd., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Kutt v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00640
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Samsung Electronics Company, LTD., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
NAZOMI COMMUNICATIONS V ARM HOLDING
as 07-1190
Defendant-Appellee:
Arm Holdings, PLC, Arm Limited and Arm, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Nazomi Communications, Inc.
NAZOMI COMMUNICATIONS V ARM HOLDING
as 04-1101
Defendant-Appellee:
ARM HOLDINGS, PLC, ARM LIMITED and ARM, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
NAZOMI COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
