Cases 11 - 20 of 151
USA v. Armando Garcia
as 23-10009
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARMANDO GARCIA
Garcia-Pacheco v. Garland
as 22-60634
Petitioner:
Edgar Armando Garcia-Pacheco
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Laura v. Conroy et al
as 4:2022cv40033
Plaintiff:
Quantreil Laura
Defendant:
Jeffrey Conroy, Janice Thomas, Armando Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Acosta et al v. Board of Trustees of UNITE HERE Health et al
as 1:2022cv01458
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Acosta, Armando Garcia, Maria Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of UNITE HERE Health and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Abreu et al v. 20 St. Wholesale Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Bolivar Abreu and Armando Garcia-Castillo
Defendant:
20 St. Wholesale Inc., Khalil Ibrahim, Abdelrahman Ibrahim and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Withers et al v. Palm Beach County Sheriff Office et al
as 9:2021cv81567
Plaintiff:
Brett Nicholas Withers, Jose L. Garcia, Jose L. Reyna and others
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff Office, Palm Beach County and Sheriff Ric Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edgar Garcia-Hernandez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70962
Petitioner:
EDGAR ARMANDO GARCIA-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Castillo-Chavez
as 21-40196
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerardo Castillo-Chavez, also known as Cachetes, also known as Armando Garcia
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Quiroz
as 21-50192
Defendant / Appellant:
Armando Garcia Quiroz, also known as Mando
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
