Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ashley-Boyd v. Monroe County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2023cv01864
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Ashley-Boyd
Defendant:
Monroe County Correctional Facility, Warden Garry Haidle, Deputy Warden Joseph McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASHLEY-BOYD v. HAIDLE
as 1:2023cv00485
Petitioner:
Jahmir Ashley-Boyd
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Garry Haidle, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Mark S. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ASHLEY-BOYD v. HAIDLE
as 2:2023cv01003
Petitioner:
JAHMIR ASHLEY-BOYD
Respondent:
GARRY HAIDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ASHLEY-BOYD v. MANTICI
as 1:2022cv02124
Plaintiff:
JAHMIR ASHLEY-BOYD
Defendant:
THOMAS MANTICI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd et al v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2020cv25041
Plaintiff:
Ashley Boyd and Claire Boyd
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation doing business as CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd et al v. Ferrara Candy Company
as 1:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
Ashley Boyd and Brian Boyd
Defendant:
Ferrara Candy Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00364
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BOYD
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUGHES et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03070
Plaintiff:
JAMALL RIDEAUX, BRANDON DALCOURT, ROBERT PHILLIPS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02045
Plaintiff:
Jamall Rideaux, Brandon Dalcourt, Robert Phillips and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
