Cases 31 - 40 of 578
Melvin Jerman v. AT&T Corporation
as 22-1855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN MCCOY JERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Billups v. AT&T Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv04116
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Billups
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Communication Workers of America and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Kincey v. AT&T Corporation
as 1:2022cv02786
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Kincey
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Rewa Duggal v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv04790
Plaintiff:
REWA DUGGAL
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORTATION, Costco Wholesale Corporation, C T Corporation System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
SAFECAST LIMITED v. AT&T Corporation
as 6:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
SAFECAST LIMITED
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. C T Corporation
as 2:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hamilton and Sandra L. Hamilton
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC and C T Corporation doing business as Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
