Cases 1 - 10 of 1,199
Kinchen et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02451
Plaintiff:
Mildred Kinchen and James Kinchen
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Schaefer v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01752
Plaintiff:
Brian Schaefer
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Baah v. AT&T Inc. West, et al.
as 24-2541
Plaintiff:
ALEX BAAH
Defendant:
AT&T INC. WEST, PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, AT AND T CORP. and others
Vita et al v. AT&T, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
David Vita, Daniel Mariscal, Charles Fairchild and others
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Oliver v. AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Oliver
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
GARNER et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00962
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY GARNER, JERYL LUCIANI and Michael CRAIN,
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Eisen et al v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
Phil Eisen and Randall McGee
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Reddersen v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2392
Plaintiff:
ATHENA REDDERSEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Hasson et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hasson and Chad Graddy
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
