Cases 1 - 10 of 768
In re: Christopher Surles
as 24-13927
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER SURLES
In re: Charles Moore
as 24-13928
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES ARTHER MOORE
Charlie Washington v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13905
Defendant:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE WASHINGTON
In re: Michael Mays
as 24-13842
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL J. MAYS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Michael LandrumIn re: Michael Landrum
as 24-13545
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL LANDRUM
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
In re: William Lucy
as 24-13459
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM N. LUCY
James McConico, Jr. v. Easterling CF Warden, et al
as 24-13338
Defendant:
ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, EASTERLING CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
JAMES MCCONICO, JR.
John White v. Cherri Pilkington, et al
as 24-13213
Defendant:
NANCY BUCKNER, THE JUDGES AND CLERKS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, AMANDA MANCUSO and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRADLEY WHITE
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, et al v. Attorney General, State of Alabama
as 24-13111
Plaintiff:
GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, ALABAMA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ALABAMA EDUCATION FUND and others
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Unknown:
SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Painter v. Mckenzie et al
as 6:2024cv01293
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Painter
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Alabama and Denice Mckenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
