Cases 1 - 10 of 404
Charlie Washington v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13905
Defendant:
HOLMAN CF WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE WASHINGTON
James McConico, Jr. v. Easterling CF Warden, et al
as 24-13338
Defendant:
ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, EASTERLING CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
JAMES MCCONICO, JR.
Painter v. Mckenzie et al
as 6:2024cv01293
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Painter
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Alabama and Denice Mckenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Standfield v. Assistant Warden, Staton CF, et al
as 24-13081
Respondent:
WARDEN, STATON CF and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY BRYAN STANDFIELD
Wesley Conor v. State of Alabama, et al
as 24-12516
Petitioner:
WESLEY DEWAYNE CONOR
Respondent:
VENTRESS CF WARDEN, STATE OF ALABAMA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Fred Bryant v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 24-11629
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, ELMORE CF WARDEN and LIMESTONE CF WARDEN
Petitioner:
FRED LEE BRYANT
Moss v. McClain
as 5:2024cv00584
Petitioner:
Scotty Dale Moss
Respondent:
Warden Antonio McClain and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy Minnifield v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 24-10083
Petitioner:
KENNEDY MINNIFIELD
Respondent:
LIMESTONE CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Jeremy Williams v. Attorney General, State of Alabama, et al
as 23-13757
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY LESHUN WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and LIMESTONE CF WARDEN
Michael Holloway v. Chambers County Sheriff, et al
as 23-13484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JEROME HOLLOWAY
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAMBERS COUNTY SHERIFF and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
