Cases 31 - 40 of 407
Jonathan Yancey v. Warden, et al
as 22-11739
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN YANCEY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and STATE OF ALABAMA
Howard v. Hasty et al

as 7:2022cv00584
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Denise Hasty and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Betty Wilson v. Attorney General, State of Alabama, et al
as 22-11414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETTY WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, MADISON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MADISON COUNTY
Joe Pickett v. Fountain CF Warden, et al
as 22-11410
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOE RANGER PICKETT
Respondent / Appellee:
FOUNTAIN CF WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and STATE OF ALABAMA
Alvarez v. Williams et al

as 1:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Hector Enrique Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden Gary Williams and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Lathers v. Warden, et al

as 22-10043
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE LATHERS
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY WILLIAMS, WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Southard v. Warden Givens et al

as 5:2021cv01684
Petitioner:
Kenny Southard
Respondent:
Warden Givens and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hopson v. State of Alabama et al

as 4:2021cv01594
Petitioner:
Dale Lynn Hopson
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Attorney General State of Alabama and Warden III Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baise v. Toney et al

as 4:2021cv01402
Petitioner:
Robert Baise, Jr.
Respondent:
Deborah Toney and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Castaneda v. Calloway et al

as 2:2020cv01377
Respondent:
Warden Calloway and Attorney General State of Alabama
Petitioner:
Alejandro Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.