Cases 21 - 30 of 97
GRACE v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2015cv00175
Petitioner:
FRAZIER CISCO GRACE
Respondent:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DePolito v. PA Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2014cv02414
Petitioner:
Thomas DePolito
Respondent:
PA Board of Probation and Parole, Lawrence Mahally and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Wenerowicz et al
as 3:2014cv02214
Petitioner:
Jesus M. Garcia
Respondent:
Michael Wenerowicz and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodell v. Wenerowicz et al
as 3:2014cv01764
Petitioner:
Rancourt Woodell
Respondent:
Mike Wenerowicz and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Appleyard v. Cameron et al
as 3:2014cv01429
Petitioner:
Thomas Appleyard
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon et al
as 3:2014cv01424
Petitioner:
Jabbar Wallace
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, Attorney General of PA and District Attorney for Luzerne County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Torres v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2014cv01064
Petitioner:
Jorge A. Torres
Respondent:
Cynthia Ramirez and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PORTALATIN v. WARDEN SCI CAMPHILL et al
as 5:2014cv03011
Petitioner:
JORGE L. PORTALATIN
Respondent:
WARDEN SCI CAMPHILL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FIGUREOA v. MOONEY et al
as 5:2014cv02876
Petitioner:
JUAN ALBERTO FIGUREOA
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Figueroa v. Mooney et al
as 3:2014cv00629
Petitioner:
Juan Alberto Figueroa
Respondent:
Vincent Mooney and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
