Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus, et al v. Wisan (Horne Appeal), et al
as 11-4071
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Defendant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Intervenor:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Movant:
HARKER DAIRY FARM and JONATHAN HARKER
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus, et al v. Wisan, et al
as 11-4066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Defendant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah and THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Intervenor:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Movant:
JONATHAN HARKER, HYRUM HARKER and HARKER DAIRY FARM
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan (Intervenors' Appeal), et al
as 11-4059
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah, THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan, et al
as 11-4053
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust
Defendant:
MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah, THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Defendant-Intervenor:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan, et al
as 11-4050
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah
Defendant:
THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona, BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Defendant-Intervenor:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan (Horne Appeal), et al
as 11-4049
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Defendant:
BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Intervenor:
RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-17418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roberto Frisancho v. Jan Brewer, et al
as 10-17115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO JAVIER FRISANCHO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAN BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona and TERRY GOODARD, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
