Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,767
Shoemaker #175421 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08083
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Jon Jeffrey Shoemaker
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esposito v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00716
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Ralph F Esposito
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Ochoa v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 21-15715
Respondent / Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant: JERRY A. OCHOA
Robert Adkins v. Lance Hetmer, et al
as 21-15717
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT JOHN ADKINS
Respondent / Appellee: LANCE HETMER, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Lofton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00714
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: John Edward Lofton
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timmons v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00668
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Willie James Timmons, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodolfo De Gante v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15664
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, ADOC, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant: RODOLFO DE GANTE
Allison v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00647
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Robert Owen Allison
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08075
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Joseph George Carter
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macario Marruffo v. David Shinn, et al
as 21-15652
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant: MACARIO IGNACIO MARRUFFO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?