Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Dinome (Borelli)
as 21-1506
Defendant:
Anthony Senter, Ronald Turekian, Richard Dinome and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Henry Borelli
Moghul et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv03168
Plaintiff:
Moshtak Muhammad, Anam Mirza, Abdullah Mohammad and others
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Wallace L. Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Al-Qarqani v. ARAB American Oil Company
as 4:2018cv01807
Plaintiff:
Waleed Bin Al-Qarqani , Al-Waleed Khalid Abu Al-Waleed Al Hood Al-Qarqabi , Ahmed Khalid Abu Al-Waleed Al Hood Al-Qarqani and others
Defendant:
ARAB American Oil Company and Aramco Services Company
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Sharaf Sanani v. Donnie Thomas, et al
as 08-5149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sharaf Al Sanani, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station, Fahd Al Haraazi and Omar (LNU)
Petitioner - Appellee:
Amer Mohammon, Detainee, Boucetta Fihi, Detainee, Elham Bataif, Detainee and others
Respondent - Appellant:
Donnie Thomas, Army Col, Commander, Joint Detention Operations Group, JTF-GTMO, Tom Copeman, Army Brig. Gen. Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO, Bruce Vargo, Army Col, Commander, Joint Detention Operations Group, JTF-GTMO and others
JABBAROV et al vs. BUSH et al
as 1:2005cv02386
Plaintiff:
OMAR (LNU), SHARAF AL SANANI, FAHD AL HARAAZI and others
Petitioner:
ABDULLAH LNU, NADIR OMAR ADULLAH BIN SAADOUN ALSAARY, AMER MOHAMMON and others
Respondent:
MIKE BUMGARNER, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae:
MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
