Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nasir v. Khokon et al
as 1:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Nasir
Defendant:
ABUL BASHAR KHOKON and Khokon Convenience Inc.
Azad v. Agtmael
as 1:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Abul Kalam Azad
Defendant:
Antoine Van Agtmael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Chowdhury et al v. Tastes On The Fly, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02682
Plaintiff:
Abul Chowdhury, Rasel Ahmed and Jahangir Ahmed
Defendant:
TASTES ON THE FLY, LLC, FLIGHT CENTER HOTEL LLC and Flight Center Hotel, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bhuiyan v. Texas Service Center et al
as 1:2021cv02570
Plaintiff:
Abul Khair Bhuiyan
Respondent:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Acting Director Tracy Renaud, Texas Service Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Khayer v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2020cv04463
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, ABC Agency 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Abul Khayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hurst v. Aswad et al
as 1:2019cv07885
Defendant:
Antonia Salazar and Abul A. Aswad
Plaintiff:
Hilford A. Hurst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au
Lu v. Purple Sushi, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05828
Defendant:
John Doe, Mingjie Wang, Pei Guan Zuo and others
Plaintiff:
Qiang Lu, Yongbing Qi and Zhenhua Duan
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Yongbing Qu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
