Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv11287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ACCOR FRANCHISING NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al v. KARMA HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv04153
Plaintiff:
ACCOR FRANCHISING NORTH AMERICA, LLC , ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. and MOTEL 6 OPERATING L.P.
Defendant:
KARMA HOLDINGS, LLC, BHARTI PATEL, PENROSE MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Site Update Solutions LLC v. Accor North America Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00151
Plaintiff:
Site Update Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Accor North America Inc, Adobe Systems Incorporated, Amazon.com Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Todd et al v. Accor North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03603
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Howard Todd and Teresa Trapp
Defendant:
Accor North America, Inc., Accor North America, Inc., Motel 6 Operating LP and others
FOREMAN v. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00545
Plaintiff:
ANTWANE FOREMAN
Defendant:
ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. and MOTEL 6 OPERATING, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
REYNOLDS-GREENE v. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2009cv02852
Plaintiff:
VICKI REYNOLDS-GREENE
Defendant:
ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
